Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.
If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.
Donate via cryptocurrency:
Bitcoin (BTC):
Ethereum (ETH):
Monero (XMR):
HelpNew DMC site hints
Thread startersweetnessofurskin
Start date
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
So I've been trying to find the new website link on the Y search engine, and couldn't find any results that would match the info. Can u give me any hints (is DMC or DSL the acronym, stuff like that).
So I've been trying to find the new website link on the Y search engine, and couldn't find any results that would match the info. Can u give me any hints (is DMC or DSL the acronym, stuff like that).
You're sharing links to DMC with a user that doesn't even have 9 postings? That's how sources die... (And I don't even want to know about DMC; horrible way to go.)
Reactions:
shocksites, L1egeCh0cholate, locked*n*loaded and 5 others
You've got 9 posts. People shouldn't be sharing anything about DMC to you (yet).
You're sharing links to DMC with a user that doesn't even have 9 postings? That's how sources die... (And I don't even want to know about DMC; horrible way to go.)
You've got 9 posts. People shouldn't be sharing anything about DMC to you (yet).
You're sharing links to DMC with a user that doesn't even have 9 postings? That's how sources die... (And I don't even want to know about DMC; horrible way to go.)
You've got 9 posts. People shouldn't be sharing anything about DMC to you (yet).
You're sharing links to DMC with a user that doesn't even have 9 postings? That's how sources die... (And I don't even want to know about DMC; horrible way to go.)
You've got 9 posts. People shouldn't be sharing anything about DMC to you (yet).
You're sharing links to DMC with a user that doesn't even have 9 postings? That's how sources die... (And I don't even want to know about DMC; horrible way to go.)
You've got 9 posts. People shouldn't be sharing anything about DMC to you (yet).
You're sharing links to DMC with a user that doesn't even have 9 postings? That's how sources die... (And I don't even want to know about DMC; horrible way to go.)
They've been a site lurker for 6 months. Just because they don't post like we do doesn't mean they aren't here for the same seasons. I took a chance with my judgement of them, sorry if you disagree.
Reactions:
fuzzypeach, swagattack and L1egeCh0cholate
They've been a site lurker for 6 months. Just because they don't post like we do doesn't mean they aren't here for the same seasons. I took a chance with my judgement of them, sorry if you disagree.
I understand where you are coming from. However, this attitude have to change a bit.
We discovered a few minors on this site by getting them to talk, and then promptly banning them.
Some people come here, get much needed emotional support, and end up not ctb'ing.
I think people should work for the right to ctb by ingratiating themselves into the community.
It will stop fast and risky decisions and dumb redundant threads.
I'm going to make a statement without much research that supports it. I bet most of the pro-lifers attacking SS are family members of people who didn't stay long in the community. I know a few long-term community members who ctb'd that tell family members in their notes not to blame anyone else in order to protect SS.
Sharing sources with the unknown and getting taken down hurts future people who probably need them more.
Reactions:
onerousyawn, NearlyIrrelevantCake, CravingPeace and 1 other person
I want to make it abundantly clear that I am not going to respond to any random DMs asking me for a source. I replied to the OP directly and did not mean to invite others to do the same. I don't even know the new website anymore. Leave me alone yall
They've been a site lurker for 6 months. Just because they don't post like we do doesn't mean they aren't here for the same seasons. I took a chance with my judgement of them, sorry if you disagree.
Love your pfp…..Is it cool if I message you too? Not even Sure I wanna use dmc …..was gonna try for nemb….. but I want the peace of mind knowing the site in case I need it…. I had JUSt Figured out the old site… go figure.
Their account age? I already admitted my mistake and turned down future DMs in the my recent comment. I'm sorry that isnt a satisfactory resolution for you.
Their account age? I already admitted my mistake and turned down future DMs in the my recent comment. I'm sorry that isnt a satisfactory resolution for you.
A site lurker for 6 months does not one make a trustworthy member. You did say in the "recent" comment you made that you DID DM the OP (the new DMC site, I assume). It's just bad form.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.