Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.
If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.
Donate via cryptocurrency:
Bitcoin (BTC):
Ethereum (ETH):
Monero (XMR):
Anyone also preferring SN over N
Thread starterSnatsbats
Start date
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Because i think SN is faster acting poison and is more brutal. Like with N it coule be that you are in a prolonged coma before you die and can end up with brain damage. With SN you are either saved in time with little consequences or death.
There are many reasons why assisted suicide organizations choose N over SN. And the number of cases resulting in a prolonged coma are a very small fraction of the total. Those cases are usually due to the person having long term use of medication that doesn't allow the N to work properly.
That being said, SN is a relatively peaceful death. I've seen it first hand.
Reactions:
NegativeSymptoms, Disco Biscuit, Meditation guide and 2 others
There are many reasons why assisted suicide organizations choose N over SN. And the number of cases resulting in a prolonged coma are a very small fraction of the total. Those cases are usually due to the person having long term use of medication that doesn't allow the N to work properly.
That being said, SN is a relatively peaceful death. I've seen it first hand.
yes but (without knowing the effects off N keep in mind) in an assisted suicide case unless someone barges in no ones going to stop you so unless you somehow survive on your own there wouldnt be any effects (which has happened, i read about a case where someone tried it SEVEN times, of course im not sure if they were using N or something else) whereas with using SN on your own in case you do get saved wouldnt you want to know that there is a very very slim chance of you not being ok?
and i think thats the difference, being stopped vs not
yes but (without knowing the effects off N keep in mind) in an assisted suicide case unless someone barges in no ones going to stop you so unless you somehow survive on your own there wouldnt be any effects (which has happened, i read about a case where someone tried it SEVEN times, of course im not sure if they were using N or something else) whereas with using SN on your own in case you do get saved wouldnt you want to know that there is a very very slim chance of you not being ok?
and i think thats the difference, being stopped vs not
You have a point. That would be the one advantage of SN over N. If you are stopped after a prolonged coma, then there might be a greater risk for brain damage with N.
But adding the probability of being stopped on top of the probability of being in a prolonged coma makes it more unlikely. It's like saying, "I don't want to eat at my favorite restaurant because I could get food poisoning. But I'm only worried about getting food poisoning if a certain chef prepares my meal".
There are many reasons why assisted suicide organizations choose N over SN. And the number of cases resulting in a prolonged coma are a very small fraction of the total. Those cases are usually due to the person having long term use of medication that doesn't allow the N to work properly.
That being said, SN is a relatively peaceful death. I've seen it first hand.
You have a point. That would be the one advantage of SN over N. If you are stopped after a prolonged coma, then there might be a greater risk for brain damage with N.
But adding the probability of being stopped on top of the probability of being in a prolonged coma makes it more unlikely. It's like saying, "I don't want to eat at my favorite restaurant because I could get food poisoning. But I'm only worried about getting food poisoning if a certain chef prepares my meal".
There are many reasons why assisted suicide organizations choose N over SN. And the number of cases resulting in a prolonged coma are a very small fraction of the total. Those cases are usually due to the person having long term use of medication that doesn't allow the N to work properly.
That being said, SN is a relatively peaceful death. I've seen it first hand.
I read that certain medication that doesn't allow nembutal to work properly is possible. Nembutal rarely fails though. I am scared however since I currently take Lyrica and buprenorphine and I'm on the highest dose of Lyrica. I don't know if this will be problematic with taking nembutal at some point. Thanks for any feedback on this.
Scroll to the bottom for statistics. You will see that there were several different complications that came up for the patients because these people are all in a critical condition that makes it more difficult to succeed. I've seen other studies where there is less of a chance of being in a prolonged comma but I don't want to go digging around to find them.
I read that certain medication that doesn't allow nembutal to work properly is possible. Nembutal rarely fails though. I am scared however since I currently take Lyrica and buprenorphine and I'm on the highest dose of Lyrica. I don't know if this will be problematic with taking nembutal at some point. Thanks for any feedback on this.
You're welcome. There is plenty of information on which medications will affect this if you use the search option to look through the forum history. If you don't want to risk taking N, SN is the best option.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.