Venting The Relevations of the System

[19-21-8-5-14-25]

This is my own place for my revelations of the system. You can laugh at me all you want, but I know the truth.
Many have different opinions on how reality has been constructed. Some believe in a God or multiple Gods, some believe in a simulation, others, understandably, just don't know and use what they can observe and see through the usage of physics what reality could be.

The objective reality will never be perceived as to be able to perceive one must have a point of view, be it through life, machinery/technology or even the spiritual sense, but all that these points of view involuntarily assert is that perception ought to be subjective. The mere fact that there are so many ways to perceive is enough evidence that this assertion should not be dismissed.

The way a human sees reality is not any more complete than that of an ant. These two species perceive reality differently, but it does not mean that one perceives reality inaccurately compared to the other. Rather they are different ways (lenses) to perceive the unperceivable objectivity of reality. This subjective nature of perception makes it then of course impossible to objectively perceive reality which would make you believe that it's a lost cause to find the answers that reality hides, or rather, the reality that we can't perceive objectively.

Rather that God constructed reality or the Big bang caused it or even both does not matter for this revelation. What matters is the existence and perception of the human. The human is able to perceive many facets and layers of reality. Think of time or even the behaviour and structure of matter or the fabric of space through mathematics or technological aid, which adds another subjective way to perceive reality and broadens the perception of the universe for humans.

Through these perceptions a revelation has occurred. That revelation shall be named determinism.

Imagine a whole row of standing domino tiles each of these tiles signifies events for this example. Assuming the Big Bang theory commenced the existence of the universe and thus the bubble of reality that humans inhabit that would in the analogy of dominoes be the first tile to have fallen. Obviously those that know about making tracks with one tile after the other know what will follow after the first one. The second one will fall and because the second one will fall the third one will fall as well and this goes on for infinite amount of times. This is the phenomenon that could be called Chain Reacting. Each tile follows a logical and predictable behaviour that one could use to know a couple of steps ahead and/or calculate what ought to occure at that particular stage. Apply this to the universe and each individual atom. Then from each atom to each molecule. Then from each molecule to each cell. Then from each cell to each lifeform.

This is the crux of determinism. The effect of something ought to have a cause for it to occur (The Big Bang theory doesn't contradict this assertion nor does the belief in a God(s), but the simulation theory is the most attractive one of the three if following this assertion wholeheartedly). Just like how with domino tiles the fifth one falls (effect becoming cause) causing the sixth one to fall as well (effect becoming a cause as well).

Applying this to the human condition and it gets quite obvious that the philosophical question of free will is utterly ridiculous.

 

[SergantWallbridge]

The first few sentences made me instinctively brace for unchinged ravings but...this is all pretty standard stuff, no? With regards to the libertarian free will (arguably the most acurate conceptualization of our intuitive sense of agency) you can argue it's fake even granting indeterminism; after all, just the fact that reality fails to be acurately described as a causal process doesn't mean that we can affect it with our will.

With regards to *philosophical* approach to this question though...are you familiar with compatibilism? Amongs philosophers it seems to be the mainstream position. It redifines the concept of free will so that it can better stand to close scrutinity and then claims the existance of such defined free will is entirely compatible with deterministic macro physics.

 

[19-21-8-5-14-25]

The next revelation is that of the illusion of free will. Visualise the build-up of a human being. Most people think of genetics. Genetics is definite as "The branch of biology that deals with heredity, especially the mechanisms of hereditary transmission and the variation of inherited characteristics among similar or related organisms." With this definition it's obvious that humans have immutable traits that determine the blueprint of an individual. Think of immutable traits like neuroticism, temperament, intelligence, height, race, skeletal structure, muscle growth, eye color, hair type and color etcetera etcetera. These traits can be either psychological or physiological or even both in some ways. This actually challenges one of the most popular philosophical questions asserting that individual organisms are born with a blank slate which is inherently wrong when factoring genetics in. The floor and ceiling of an individual has been set by their genetics and thus they can't be born a blank slate but rather a tainted slate from the beginning just from genetics alone.

Take temperament for example. The genotypes that determine the temperament of an individual is phenotypically expressed as having a "personality". This phenomenon called "personality" was then determined by genetics to a large extent and thus hardly a choice of the person.

This is what could be named Genetic Determinism.

 

[19-21-8-5-14-25]

But Genetic Determinism is not everything. Humans are exposed and altered by the environment they inhabit and directly or indirectly interact with. Notice that it was teased before that genetics serve as the determining factor of not just how humans phenotypically express themselves through their genes, but also how genetics determine and set the floor and ceiling of that phenotypical expression. The environment plays a crucial role on determining in such a small window where phenotypically the expression of an individual is. In the between the floor and ceiling, closer to the ceiling or closer to the floor. How and what is determined as the floor and ceiling is highly debatable and subjective but take height for example. This is a physiological immutable trait that has a set ceiling and floor for an individual determined through genetics. If an individual during their formative years does not get enough resources (food, water, sunlight or other sustenance) for the body to utilise for their growth in height they would most probably not hit the ceiling of what could possibly have been even if genotypically it was possible. This does not contradict genetic determinism as each person's ceiling and floor is different and will determine how phenotypical expressions appear depending on environmental and external circumstances. It actually explains how there could be phenotypical variation between members of the same species and, even more convincing, between members of the same family and identical twins.

Why this is a relevant phenomenon to name and describe is because of how people trivialise and undervalue the impact the environment has on an individual. The other coin of the unfortunate human foolishness on this topic is that they reason that with this phenomenon and free will a person has reign over their own fate, they are wrong.

Even before congestion the individual will be environmentally affected and influenced. Think of the sperm quality of the male or that of the female because of their own negligence of their health and body (i.e. smoking or drinking alcohol). These are environmental factors that determine the fate of an individual even before being a singular cell in the womb of the female. Extrapolate this and think of when the individual is forming as a baby inside the womb of the female. The baby is wholly dependent on the female who herself could be dependent on others (as they are pregnant). The negligence of the female's health through her own behaviours or more sinister the stress the female is exposed to because of the environment around her (abusive male partner for example) all will determine how the individual will form. These are all environmental conditions and factors influencing the fate of the individual. Finally after the birth the individual will be even more tainted as a child.

This phenomenon and that of genetic determinism are derivative of the revelation chain reacting. This shall be named Environmental Determinism.

 

[19-21-8-5-14-25]

Recommendation of movie based on these revelations: Tenet (2020).

 

[Loner]

This is my own place for my revelations of the system. You can laugh at me all you want, but I know the truth.
Many have different opinions on how reality has been constructed. Some believe in a God or multiple Gods, some believe in a simulation, others, understandably, just don't know and use what they can observe and see through the usage of physics what reality could be.

The objective reality will never be perceived as to be able to perceive one must have a point of view, be it through life, machinery/technology or even the spiritual sense, but all that these points of view involuntarily assert is that perception ought to be subjective. The mere fact that there are so many ways to perceive is enough evidence that this assertion should not be dismissed.

The way a human sees reality is not any more complete than that of an ant. These two species perceive reality differently, but it does not mean that one perceives reality inaccurately compared to the other. Rather they are different ways (lenses) to perceive the unperceivable objectivity of reality. This subjective nature of perception makes it then of course impossible to objectively perceive reality which would make you believe that it's a lost cause to find the answers that reality hides, or rather, the reality that we can't perceive objectively.

Rather that God constructed reality or the Big bang caused it or even both does not matter for this revelation. What matters is the existence and perception of the human. The human is able to perceive many facets and layers of reality. Think of time or even the behaviour and structure of matter or the fabric of space through mathematics or technological aid, which adds another subjective way to perceive reality and broadens the perception of the universe for humans.

Through these perceptions a revelation has occurred. That revelation shall be named determinism.

Imagine a whole row of standing domino tiles each of these tiles signifies events for this example. Assuming the Big Bang theory commenced the existence of the universe and thus the bubble of reality that humans inhabit that would in the analogy of dominoes be the first tile to have fallen. Obviously those that know about making tracks with one tile after the other know what will follow after the first one. The second one will fall and because the second one will fall the third one will fall as well and this goes on for infinite amount of times. This is the phenomenon that could be called Chain Reacting. Each tile follows a logical and predictable behaviour that one could use to know a couple of steps ahead and/or calculate what ought to occure at that particular stage. Apply this to the universe and each individual atom. Then from each atom to each molecule. Then from each molecule to each cell. Then from each cell to each lifeform.

This is the crux of determinism. The effect of something ought to have a cause for it to occur (The Big Bang theory doesn't contradict this assertion nor does the belief in a God(s), but the simulation theory is the most attractive one of the three if following this assertion wholeheartedly). Just like how with domino tiles the fifth one falls (effect becoming cause) causing the sixth one to fall as well (effect becoming a cause as well).

Applying this to the human condition and it gets quite obvious that the philosophical question of free will is utterly ridiculous.

I absolutely believe that we are living in a simulation controlled by evil. I wonder what happens when we die. I really hope it's the end of me cuz I don't want to exist anymore. I've had more than enough.