This is pretty lengthy, so I started skimming and trying to pick up key ideas/concepts towards the end. I'll be responding to what I perceive the overall philosophy here to be, and how such a forum could justify its existence.
My therapist herself has expressed a somewhat libertarian outlook on suicide and personal autonomy. She ofc, is still obligated to report/break confidentiality if I express myself to be an imminent danger to myself. On the framing of "pro-life" vs "pro-choice" vs "pro-suicide" as vernacular on this website, I suppose I'm about as pro suicide as I am pro abortion since these are such apt analogies. I'm pro choice, but there's probably many instances where the death of a human being is immoral, but how much should the state have the power to intervene?
My most confident stance on abortion is that during the first couple trimesters, and thus prior to the advancing fetal stage, there should be no state restrictions whatsoever. However I do strongly question the moral legitimacy of someone electively aborting a viable fetus when there isn't a health concern to the prospective mother nor baby. What the state's involvement in such a decision is something I'm agnostic to. I'm both very fearful of laws governing late term abortions causing more harm than good, and I know that late stage/third trimester abortions are almost never done just for the hell of it without moral consideration. The mother has already bought a crib and either already decided, or is thinking about the name of the child they want. They'll mourn the loss of their child whom they're only removing because something has gone wrong, and she fears for her own life or thinks the life of her child is doomed.
Similarly, I think about the name of this forum "sanctioned-suicide". Ideally, I believe that's how suicide should be permitted in a liberal society, with state regulation and guard rails to make sure that this person is acting of sound mind, or is capable of informed consent to euthanasia if medical professionals actively assist. I think again about the "pro-life" vs "pro-choice" framing on the issue of suicide. As someone who is transsexual, I also think similarly about undergoing gender transition medically, and how serious of a decision that is, but I also want state regulation on doing so as minimal as possible, and this leads into my next point about when liberalism does not live up to its promise of maximizing our freedom and acting as a legitimate authority we consent to being governed by for our own self interest. Access to abortion is something too severely limited and/or under threat depending on the state you live in (I'm American), and there is also increasing government overreach on access to gender transition or a thread of government overreach on access to transition. Do most liberal countries overreach in terms of preventing voluntary informed suicides by consenting adults of sober mind? I believe so.
I guess that's where this forum comes in. If the state is overreaching in restricting human autonomy, I don't think it's immoral to seek out parallel structures and to act in gray or even extralegal manners to assert your autonomy. Previously, when Biden was president, and prior to the huge counter-wave against trans acceptance, I found myself being critical of DIY trans resources, especially minors having access to them in the US. Ideally if you're a minor and think you might be experiencing gender dysphoria, and are considering medical gender transition, there should be reliable institutions who can screen you for gender dysphoria and help you and your parent or responsible guardian make an informed decision on what is the best decision to move forward with. However, if the state forbids such a process, perhaps seeking out they DIY resources and self medicating with grey market hormones may be necessary. I feel the same about abortion. And that leads finally into the real focus of this forum: suicide.
Pro lifers when it comes to abortion seem to believe that abortion is NEVER a moral or permissible option. The overwhelming moral consensus of people seems to feel this way about suicide, and that seems to be enshrined into law in the US. If there's no medical instituions with appropriate state regulation that can allow sanctioned suicide or voluntary euthanasia, then perhaps it makes sense for people to seek out DIY resources if it seems like suicide is their best option and the state considers their choice illegitimate. I remember hearing a while back about a teenage girl who was mentally broken by a rape in Finland who was given euthanasia because she was unable to be healed of her trauma by peer or familial support and mental health resources. If someone who is age of majority and of sound mind finds themselves wanting the same thing under similiar pretexts, but the state would no sanction their death, but would instead imprison them against their will for wanting that, what should they do?
I think forums like these are the only place where it can be even DISCUSSED what the answer to such questions would be without social or legal reprisal.