Many people ask beliefs and stuff like afterlife. However most if not all ignores how and what is information and how humans process it. Maybe because its still a new way to look at things (but honestly it's just a part of human arrogance and how they don't want to analyze themselves).
Everyone takes a form of input and changes it to an output. That means whatever one hear or see from others is their output. To check whether it's true or not, verification is needed and if its impossible to verify, then the others who are telling you something, are just telling a baseless thing.
Many humans take this baseless piece of information as a truth while actually its not. Actually it's just gambling, Imagine a box and you don't know the color of the ball inside (lets assume it's either white or black). Choosing a color is gambling here, it's not a truth and you can't know it unless you open the box.
However, some people might think this enhances the argument for beliefs while it's not. Humans might not know what's inside but it's not rational to put any statement and say it's true.
"My X belief is true. Because we don't know about life".
Actually even as a state of gambling, it's not rational:
"My belief X is probable. Because we don't know about life".
It's possible to put anything as X and say it's true or think its possible which is actually a fallacy. You can't prove it's truth and gambling in this case is absurd because not only two balls here but infinitely many cases.
Aside from abstract explanations, whenever you hear someone argue in this manner, you should question their ulterior motives. In many cases, this is where mind control and manipulation happens. Sometimes also they are afraid of the reality.
Also this is all theoretical and in real life it's actually way worse and full of contradiction and faults.
Can humans verify the truth of something?
The answer is yes. Although not absolute (as in having all the details) but you can prove and verify many things. E.g. If you throw a ball, it will fall and then you verify the act of falling. If something is hard or impossible to verify, it's usually something arbitrarily large (same as how it's hard/impossible for computing machines).
Humans are delusional, how could they prove something?
There is logic and there are mathematical objects/constructs and those are independent from humans. Human constructs on the other hand are the source of delusions. For example, a square could be defined mathematically and that definition is independent of human existence. However, a square defined in a natural language could have different meanings which all rely on the existence and perception of a human and this causes errors or delusions.
So that was kind of long and maybe complicated. There is also the fact of how information is distorted and changed when it goes through multiple people. To demonstrate that, play a communication game with multiple people to transfer a word or action. The result would be very different from the original word or action. If you apply it on larger scale like real life, the error and delusions would be much greater.
Many humans spend much time doubting their thinking capabilities instead of really using it to know the truth.
Everyone takes a form of input and changes it to an output. That means whatever one hear or see from others is their output. To check whether it's true or not, verification is needed and if its impossible to verify, then the others who are telling you something, are just telling a baseless thing.
Many humans take this baseless piece of information as a truth while actually its not. Actually it's just gambling, Imagine a box and you don't know the color of the ball inside (lets assume it's either white or black). Choosing a color is gambling here, it's not a truth and you can't know it unless you open the box.
However, some people might think this enhances the argument for beliefs while it's not. Humans might not know what's inside but it's not rational to put any statement and say it's true.
"My X belief is true. Because we don't know about life".
Actually even as a state of gambling, it's not rational:
"My belief X is probable. Because we don't know about life".
It's possible to put anything as X and say it's true or think its possible which is actually a fallacy. You can't prove it's truth and gambling in this case is absurd because not only two balls here but infinitely many cases.
Aside from abstract explanations, whenever you hear someone argue in this manner, you should question their ulterior motives. In many cases, this is where mind control and manipulation happens. Sometimes also they are afraid of the reality.
Also this is all theoretical and in real life it's actually way worse and full of contradiction and faults.
Can humans verify the truth of something?
The answer is yes. Although not absolute (as in having all the details) but you can prove and verify many things. E.g. If you throw a ball, it will fall and then you verify the act of falling. If something is hard or impossible to verify, it's usually something arbitrarily large (same as how it's hard/impossible for computing machines).
Humans are delusional, how could they prove something?
There is logic and there are mathematical objects/constructs and those are independent from humans. Human constructs on the other hand are the source of delusions. For example, a square could be defined mathematically and that definition is independent of human existence. However, a square defined in a natural language could have different meanings which all rely on the existence and perception of a human and this causes errors or delusions.
So that was kind of long and maybe complicated. There is also the fact of how information is distorted and changed when it goes through multiple people. To demonstrate that, play a communication game with multiple people to transfer a word or action. The result would be very different from the original word or action. If you apply it on larger scale like real life, the error and delusions would be much greater.
Many humans spend much time doubting their thinking capabilities instead of really using it to know the truth.
