You sure can think your way
into it though, if you think about the horrid current state of the world...
Isn't edmr pseudoscience?
I think so - by which I refer to the proper definition of pseudoscience, which is something purporting to be scientific when it is in fact not.
The following passage from
the EMDR Institute screams pseudoscience to me - afaik there is no established "traumatic memory network":
"Shapiro (1995, 2001) hypothesizes that EMDR therapy facilitates the accessing of the traumatic memory network, so that information processing is enhanced, with new associations forged between the traumatic memory and more adaptive memories or information."
Francine Shapiro just randomlt thought up the process one day when she felt less anxious after talking a walk in the woods and noticing her eyes flitting about. This totally ignores the therapeutic benefits of nature & exercise, and the fact that
humans generally have this specific kind of eye movement in response to general external stimuli.
Other critics have been more damning, comparing it to that "
one weird trick", noting the absurdity that we might have unlocked the vast secrets of the human brain (of which we truky know absolutely nothing) by doing something so ridiculously simple. EMDR has
not been found to be any more effective than any other form of major cognitive therapy, which nearly all rely on the same premise of exposure under safe circumstances.
Evidence has been mounting for a long time that one of the most, if not
the most important factors in a successful therapeutic experience is
the relationship between therapist and client. This could potentially be at play if those offering EMDR aren't the usual clinician assholes we all know and hate. There could also be an element of placebo aspect at play - with all the hype of EMDR being a "miracle cure" one may go into it having higher expectations it will work.
Only things like drugs or TMS (or...lobotomies) really work the brain directly, but they also are
subject to placebo, failure, and are
not without their own risks. The problem is studies are usually funded by those with vested interest in showing success. We're fucked for transparency in options, really.