W
wham311
Warlock
- Mar 1, 2025
- 763
I am reconsidering sn as an option. I did not go through with it in April because I was worried it would not work for me.
I have reason to believe my muscles have atrophied (internal so stomach, etc). I don't have gastroparesis as "Mav" did in this thread:
sanctioned-suicide.net
"have a medical condition called gastroparesis. My stomach is 85% paralyzed. Fasting times for me are incredibly different from normal because contents remain in my stomach 85% longer than the norm. Tht being said, I absorb through the stomach incredibly slow. If I take medication, it takes up to 3-4 hours to start working & I need a considerably higher dose than the recommended ones. I researched it at great length taking into consideration the half life of the SN, as well as the antiemetics. Also calculating my gastric emptying with absorption rated to ensure that the method would be successful. I didn't fail because I didn't follow the "protocol". I failed because there is absolutely no way to accurately calculate or measure the amount/potency with my medical condition. I also have AI, in which my body does not produce cortisol. If you don't know what that is, then there is no way for you to be able to understand why or how I determined the formula I used. I'll say again….everyone is different, this is NOT one size fits all, and it is most certainly NOT guaranteed. I am not trying to troll or give misinformation. I'm telling my experience associated with the way my body functions.
Taking all that into consideration, makes my experience far from flawed. It makes the protocol flawed because it gives absolutely NO consideration to such obstacles that absolutely need to account for changes & major modifications".
But I believe the results would potentially be similar
Can anyone familiar with anatomy or this method please help? I am in absolute agony
I have reason to believe my muscles have atrophied (internal so stomach, etc). I don't have gastroparesis as "Mav" did in this thread:

SN may not be the best choice
A lot of people suggest using SN for pretty much anything. At first it may have been a good method but I think it is becoming less and less reliable. I'm sure most people have heard this but a lot of sources of SN aren't completely pure which then sequences a very thorough purity test. If you...

"have a medical condition called gastroparesis. My stomach is 85% paralyzed. Fasting times for me are incredibly different from normal because contents remain in my stomach 85% longer than the norm. Tht being said, I absorb through the stomach incredibly slow. If I take medication, it takes up to 3-4 hours to start working & I need a considerably higher dose than the recommended ones. I researched it at great length taking into consideration the half life of the SN, as well as the antiemetics. Also calculating my gastric emptying with absorption rated to ensure that the method would be successful. I didn't fail because I didn't follow the "protocol". I failed because there is absolutely no way to accurately calculate or measure the amount/potency with my medical condition. I also have AI, in which my body does not produce cortisol. If you don't know what that is, then there is no way for you to be able to understand why or how I determined the formula I used. I'll say again….everyone is different, this is NOT one size fits all, and it is most certainly NOT guaranteed. I am not trying to troll or give misinformation. I'm telling my experience associated with the way my body functions.
Taking all that into consideration, makes my experience far from flawed. It makes the protocol flawed because it gives absolutely NO consideration to such obstacles that absolutely need to account for changes & major modifications".
But I believe the results would potentially be similar
Can anyone familiar with anatomy or this method please help? I am in absolute agony