Pissed off

[GreenTree]

Admin keep moving my posts too off topic. We can't discuss suicide anymore. This site is dead. I'm pissed off. Why change it. It was fine.

 

[Bleak]

https://sanctioned-suicide.net/threads/the-purpose-of-this-subforum.80645/#post-1442978

https://sanctioned-suicide.net/forums/suicide-questions.17/

 

[GreenTree]

Cheers bleak
No one seams to go on that sub forum.

 

[Bleak]

It was just created yesterday so maybe that is why. The forum has been under fire since the New York Times article and then US Congress trying to get it shut down.

 

[GreenTree]

Thank you. I didn't realise the website was trying to be closed down. This website is a godsend to us. They just don't understand.

 

[NotSureToEndure]

https://sanctioned-suicide.net/threads/the-purpose-of-this-subforum.80645/#post-1442978

https://sanctioned-suicide.net/forums/suicide-questions.17/

Do we have to do something to be allowed access to these?

 

[Bleak]

Do we have to do something to be allowed access to these?

I don't know. They are accessible to me.

 

[NotSureToEndure]

I don't know. They are accessible to me.

Interesting, it comes up with 'You do not have permission to view this page or perform this action.' for me!

 

[GreenTree]

Do we have to do something to be allowed access to these?

Probably make a certain number of posts.

 

[motel rooms]

Interesting, it comes up with 'You do not have permission to view this page or perform this action.' for me!

You haven't made enough posts yet.

 

[NotSureToEndure]

Fair enough, I better get posting then

 

[GreenTree]

Fair enough, I better get posting then

Think it's 25 posts. Not totally sure though. Might be more.

 

[Chinaski]

If the only pre-requisite to access secure areas of the forum is post count, is this post count difficult to attain or relatively low?

I ask because there are many opportunities on this forum to boost a post count with minimal effort. There are rules around pm access for example, which are easily circumnavigated by posting in threads like "counting game", or "pick one word to describe" etc. As such it's not a hugely effective security measure if the requirement for entry is essentially spammable and the criteria is post quantity, rather than quality.

 

[needed_]

Think it's 25 posts. Not totally sure though. Might be more.

i have more than 300 and don't have access..

 

[GreenTree]

i have more than 300 and don't have access..

Might be length of membership too. I see you only joined 13 days ago. Might be 14 days membership or more. I don't know the requirements. I've done just over 300 posts and can access it so I assume length of forum membership is a requirement too. There are hardly any posts on there anyway so your not missing much.

 

[Onkyo74893]

On the other hand, it was the NYT article that led me to this site. The name was in the article.

 

[needed_]

Might be length of membership too. I see you only joined 13 days ago. Might be 14 days membership or more. I don't know the requirements. I've done just over 300 posts and can access it so I assume length of forum membership is a requirement too. There are hardly any posts on there anyway so your not missing much.

you're right that might be a reason. guess I'll wait and see

 

[NotSureToEndure]

you're right that might be a reason. guess I'll wait and see

Who knows - You lack the time, I lack the posts! :)

Edit: the links work for me now!

 

[needed_]

Who knows - You lack the time, I lack the posts! :)

Edit: the links work for me now!

I guess the time counts more than the number of posts. I understand that

 

[I should go]

it doesnt work