J
jizz676
Student
- Sep 25, 2018
- 136
We wanted to share a quick update with the community.
Our public expense ledger is now live, allowing anyone to see how donations are used to support the ongoing operation of the site.
👉 View the ledger here
Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.
If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.
Donate via cryptocurrency:
that made me very sad... so sad I couldn't even watch all of it
Was it painful?
I noticed that tooI don't know. It was pretty quick though.
that made me very sad... so sad I couldn't even watch all of it
why dont they use carbon monooxide?1. 98% Helium
2. no stress for the animal
3. you can see it how the muscles still contract after death which proofs No.2
3. method is more expensive than anesthesia with CO2
4. meat quality seems to be better (more studies needed to proof that) ... Hannibal ^^ ?
pigs seem to have: (when you believe their studies)
breathing trouble
escape symptoms (they try to escape)
amount of stress hormones in the blood doubled in comparison to helium
they say: it is more animal friendly with helium
so carbon monooxide is as bad as co2?
no. what I wrote was said about co2... that was a misunderstanding... I deleted it
I think it´s because safety reasons and is more practical
co2 is heavier than air so you can let it down into a pit
1. 98% Helium
True or false;
100% is An entirely different story, not shocking for the eye.
?