On a side note. That is an amazing rock image, OP. Where did you find it??
not necessarily. there are people who pass away surrounded by their loved ones. there is no reason to support "we are all alone in the end"—hell, this very forum is a testament to how humans can find company in any way in any place; can relate to any thing in their life with another.
"All alone", "in the end", these are vague terms—and they paint an opaque picture—when in reality, life brims with detail of so much of which slips our eyes so easily. We experience loneliness, but there
are still moments where we are not lonely—fireflies in darkness render out that "all" in that shade; it is partial—for even in a total solar eclipse, the corona persists.
Do we really understand? I dare say we exist in most profound confusion, at so many times. This can be bad—and it can be good. But our confusion must not be a
thought-terminating cliché nor a dead end—but primordial soup for thought to come, realizations we do not know we do not know of.
anyone who feels loneliness is "destiny" or "divine decree" is merely expressing how they feel out of control, and struggle to feel impact from their actions and intentions.
The truth is—these feelings of "divine decree" are just our brains trying to make sense of feelings of lost control. But feelings of lost control do not necessarily mean the total demolition of actionable steps, nor any actual perfect void of inactability.
I have a long post in progress in which I write about loneliness and its functions in vivid detail, and how human biology relates to it, and what the solution of it looks like in reality. I will link it here once it is posted: for all people who may be curious.
There is fault. The people who engineered the atomization of the individual, capitalism, every one who wielded power against the good of human life, of free time,
freedom (economic, social, all kinds)—they are all to blame for the loneliness that the common person feels. The third place did not vanish without cause—it was a result of identifiable factors.
You are forgiving others to guilt yourself even when you have done no wrong—you grew up in flawed cultures in odd societal structures, trying to make sense of things. We are never at fault for just trying to live well and make sense of things <3. We're bound to fuck up when trying to live into harmony in that way, but with every fuck up, there is education written not only into our mind, but our nerves—there is a kind of visceral education that is truly the muscle memory of self-knowledge, and human life.
Just because we do not know what happened, does not mean there was no cause. You may be very tempted to consign whatever you cannot put a cause to—whatever rolls off the tip of your mind's tongue, or falls away from your sight's fingertips—to destiny. But fate is no explanation, and saying "it was going to happen anyway" is more of a thought-terminating cliché than anything. We should not deprive ourselves of explanation. If we do not know why something happened, we ought admit so, blatantly. We should not toss it off to "destiny's gloves" nor fate's brooms, but pick it up and inspect it ourselves—for that is our life, our reality. We should understand it—not regard it as anything beyond us. For if we can know it at a surface level, we can know it at a deeper level. Why not study that? It is better to have some clarity, at least—and it is true freedom to not deprive ourselves of that possibility of deeper understanding. Why do we say "we know"? When there is so much we still have to know. We do not know what we do not know… and this is an awe no invocation of fate can ever register.
Let us think, analyze, be confused, and realize—and not assign any analyzable thing, to a cognitive burial—which is what destiny assignment amounts to. And whatever is buried that way, can be dug up again: and seen again. We should take another look at what we think cannot be seen through.