This topic reminds me of the phrase "If you truly love someone, you must let them go." I don't interpret the "letting go" part as completely forgetting about the individual or no longer experiencing (negative) emotions about their departure. My interpretation refers to allowing the individual to leave your life (e.g. moving away, breaking up, divorcing, going no-contact, dying, ect.) without obstructing or manipulating them from their exit in any way.
Since unconditional love doesn't exist, relationships appear to be based on possession and utility. The more "useful" an individual is (e.g. providing entertainment, staving off loneliness, bolstering someone's image, ego, social status, purpose, and meaning; introducing them to new experiences, information, and/or opportunities; providing material possessions and/or labor; ect.), the stronger the other's desire is to keep them close as long as possible. This results in the other's strong opposition of losing the individual, even to the point of disregarding their needs and wishes.
Therefore, my vote for this poll is "No."