anybody here thinks that the debreather could be working? i purchased the first version... there were some bugs around it apparently but i am reconsidering the method and would be interested in having a discussion with others who think about it as well
-
Hey Guest,
We wanted to share a quick update with the community.
Our public expense ledger is now live, allowing anyone to see how donations are used to support the ongoing operation of the site.
👉 View the ledger hereOver the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.
If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.
Donate via cryptocurrency:
Bitcoin (BTC):Ethereum (ETH):Monero (XMR):
LifeHasNoOptIn
Worst Life Ever
- Mar 31, 2022
- 208
From what I remember reading about it, the concept was sound but the mask was not reliable for maintaining the necessary seal through to the end. There was talk of an improved version that addressed this, but not sure how effective the new version was. Its a great idea in principle as it's basically the inert gas method without the need for the inert gas.
wljourney
Waiting for the bus
- Apr 2, 2022
- 1,419
I really liked it too. The idea of just drifting away - perfect. However the mask staying on long enough and well sealed seems to be the problem. Facial muscles relaxing means gaps around the mask.
It would be cool to redesign with a comfortable helmet design if that's possible.
Considered buying the latest model a few days ago… now I'm not sure.Similar threads
- phoebusapollo
- Suicide Discussion
Suicide Discussionphoebusapollo
