• Hey Guest,

    We wanted to share a quick update with the community.

    Our public expense ledger is now live, allowing anyone to see how donations are used to support the ongoing operation of the site.

    👉 View the ledger here

    Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.

    If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.

    Donate via cryptocurrency:

    Bitcoin (BTC):
    Ethereum (ETH):
    Monero (XMR):
D

Deleted member 1768

Enlightened
Aug 15, 2018
1,107



Police are NOT doctors, and cannot/should not be used for so-called 'welfare checks'.

Privacy and confidentiality laws permit the medical profession to hide important information from both the family and the patient. How often do patients commit suicide after being committed? How many patients find the medication they are given beneficial? Etc.
 
GoodPersonEffed

GoodPersonEffed

Brevity is my middle name, but my name was TL
Jan 11, 2020
6,726
I disagree that police shouldn't do welfare checks. If someone isn't responding, they could have been the victim of a crime, and in fact the criminal could still be on the premises. Medics aren't trained or equipped for that, but police are trained in life saving techniques like CPR.
 
  • Like
Reactions: autumnal and Isadeth

Similar threads