• Hey Guest,

    We wanted to share a quick update with the community.

    Our public expense ledger is now live, allowing anyone to see how donations are used to support the ongoing operation of the site.

    👉 View the ledger here

    Over the past year, increased regulatory pressure in multiple regions like UK OFCOM and Australia's eSafety has led to higher operational costs, including infrastructure, security, and the need to work with more specialized service providers to keep the site online and stable.

    If you value the community and would like to help support its continued operation, donations are greatly appreciated. If you wish to donate via Bank Transfer or other options, please open a ticket.

    Donate via cryptocurrency:

    Bitcoin (BTC):
    Ethereum (ETH):
    Monero (XMR):
P

PainAndSadness

Student
Sep 21, 2022
123
I've tried asking this in the megathread and elsewhere but haven't received a response. Would it be a bad idea to use both the charcoal method and put grills in the car AND also use a gasoline generator to create as much CO ppm possible or would it be more efficient and cause you to ctb quicker?

Because from my understanding the charcoal method says to NOT use gasoline/diesel but to use simply paper and vegetable/olive oil to light the charcoal whereas the generator runs on gasoline so I'm not sure if the two methods would interfere and cause an adverse effect?

Also, if anyone knows what kind of generator is the best for CO production and what to look out for (I know it has to be non carb compliant, carbuereted etc. but if anyone can ppm me brands and names of gens that would be super helpful)
 
locked*n*loaded

locked*n*loaded

Archangel
Apr 15, 2022
9,592
With enough charcoal, generator shouldn't be necessary. The vehicle needs to be well sealed. Also, with good charcoal, you won't have to breathe all the nasties that a generator will be putting out into the car, as long as you wait until the coals are red/white hot before moving them into the car.
 
Upvote 0
locked*n*loaded

locked*n*loaded

Archangel
Apr 15, 2022
9,592
I know but it's for extra security, would the two methods interfere?
No idea if they'd interfere. Generator fumes are noxious. I'd rather not smell anything noxious on my way out. I'm not sure what the interference would be. I've heard under certain circumstances CO can be explosive, but if that's the case, I would think the heat from the charcoals could set it off just as much as any generator, maybe more so. New generators run much cleaner than old ones, so probably won't produce as much CO as they used to if that means anything. If it were me, I'd use just one thing to produce the CO. This is my method for when the time comes, some time next year. I'll be using charcoal in a tent. My Plan B is nitrogen. Someone else will chime in and hopefully answer your questions more concisely. Good luck.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sick of it all
Upvote 0
P

PainAndSadness

Student
Sep 21, 2022
123
No idea if they'd interfere. Generator fumes are noxious. I'd rather not smell anything noxious on my way out. I'm not sure what the interference would be. I've heard under certain circumstances CO can be explosive, but if that's the case, I would think the heat from the charcoals could set it off just as much as any generator, maybe more so. New generators run much cleaner than old ones, so probably won't produce as much CO as they used to if that means anything. If it were me, I'd use just one thing to produce the CO. This is my method for when the time comes, some time next year. I'll be using charcoal in a tent. My Plan B is nitrogen. Someone else will chime in and hopefully answer your questions more concisely. Good luck.
Alright…
 
Upvote 0

Similar threads

D
Replies
9
Views
1K
Suicide Discussion
do0mer
D
W
Replies
5
Views
179
Suicide Discussion
WhyMe123
W
J
Replies
27
Views
3K
Suicide Discussion
isthisthingon
I
M
  • Question
Replies
26
Views
2K
Suicide Discussion
Groundhog_Day
Groundhog_Day
C
Replies
1
Views
228
Offtopic
fedup1982
F