• UK users: Due to a formal investigation into this site by Ofcom under the UK Online Safety Act 2023, we strongly recommend using a trusted, no-logs VPN. This will help protect your privacy, bypass censorship, and maintain secure access to the site. Read the full VPN guide here.

  • Hey Guest,

    Today, OFCOM launched an official investigation into Sanctioned Suicide under the UK’s Online Safety Act. This has already made headlines across the UK.

    This is a clear and unprecedented overreach by a foreign regulator against a U.S.-based platform. We reject this interference and will be defending the site’s existence and mission.

    In addition to our public response, we are currently seeking legal representation to ensure the best possible defense in this matter. If you are a lawyer or know of one who may be able to assist, please contact us at [email protected].

    Read our statement here:

    Donate via cryptocurrency:

    Bitcoin (BTC): 34HyDHTvEhXfPfb716EeEkEHXzqhwtow1L
    Ethereum (ETH): 0xd799aF8E2e5cEd14cdb344e6D6A9f18011B79BE9
    Monero (XMR): 49tuJbzxwVPUhhDjzz6H222Kh8baKe6rDEsXgE617DVSDD8UKNaXvKNU8dEVRTAFH9Av8gKkn4jDzVGF25snJgNfUfKKNC8
paredler

paredler

Student
Jul 31, 2022
191
The scandinavian countries have a very comprehensive welfare system, but they're still capitalist, with class disparities, wage gaps and people who are considered "poor". The scandinavian countries are capitalism with good welfare, but it's still capitalism. Theoretically, one day these states can run out of capital and will no longer have enough to asist their people. It's not like these countries work on a completely different economic system, it's not like they organize their society in a completely different way than the U.S. The only difference is how much welfare assistance is there, but it's assistance.e it's not like poor people manage to live on their own without government help, they are dependant on external help in a free market economy. By the way, even though the scandinavian countries managed to eliminate homelessness completely, they didn't do it by building more houses, but by different ways. The country doesn't necessarily produce more of the things that are in scarcity are necessary for survival. They government just buys it for them. Also, there's no direct workplace democracy or employee empowerment. If there is a democracy in the workplace, it's a very indirect one. Its the government assistance that allows you to have some bargaining power against your workplace, but it's not like you "own the means of production".