• ⚠️ UK Access Block Notice: Beginning July 1, 2025, this site will no longer be accessible from the United Kingdom. This is a voluntary decision made by the site's administrators. We were not forced or ordered to implement this block.

Y

yyytry

:(
Sep 8, 2022
217
I know there are some religious groups that protect the right to have access to abortion medicine.

but what about for meds to die painlessly with?

Could this be made?
 
N

Norseman

Autistic virgin
Aug 31, 2024
12
I know there are some religious groups that protect the right to have access to abortion medicine.

but what about for meds to die painlessly with?

Could this be made?
All religions are made to control the slaves, so they all prohibit slaves to break free from the system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: suicidenow, blackpillhopeless, EvisceratedJester and 5 others
Y

yyytry

:(
Sep 8, 2022
217
All religions are made to control the slaves, so they all prohibit slaves to break free from the system.
I'm talking about those loopholes and work arounds.

Like if a group was recognized and there are certain exemptions or allowances for said belief group.

Part of it would be, "we have the right to choose when we die, in a peaceful and painless manner"

There's gotta be a way to do this.
 
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: BlueButterfly111 and courtingthereaper
L

Loaf of bread

Warlock
Mar 22, 2022
742
  • Like
  • Love
Reactions: Tommen Baratheon and BlueButterfly111
L'absent

L'absent

Banned
Aug 18, 2024
1,391
Ah, a religion that grants the right to leave without suffering, without restrictions, without the need to invent some noble spiritual justification for it? A religion that does not see your life as a divine loan to be returned only when the creditor decides? Fascinating. If such a religion existed, it would be revolutionary, an anomaly, a masterpiece of consistency. But there's a small problem: the religious marketplace doesn't work that way.
Their first doctrine is that life was given to you by someone else. God, the universe, karma, cosmic energy—choose whichever name you prefer, the concept remains the same: it's never yours. It's a gift, a duty, a trial, a sentence, but never, ever a personal possession to manage as you see fit. And like any borrowed property, you don't get to decide the terms of its return. You can complain all you want, despair, even come to despise this 'gift,' but the answer will always be the same: 'It's not time yet.' And the best part? That time never comes. Suffering is sacred currency in religions. The more you suffer, the more you are worth. Pain redeems, pain purifies, pain brings you closer to divinity. But not just any pain—oh no, it has to be the right kind of pain, the 'approved' kind. Dying because a god decided so? Perfectly acceptable. Dying because society sends you to war? Legitimate. Dying because you're sick and nature has decreed that you must endure agony? A mysterious ordeal to be accepted with humility. But choosing to die because you decide it, in full clarity and without suffering? Heresy. And here lies the core of the issue: religions do not fight against death. They fight against the idea that you might claim it as your own. That you might choose when, how, and why, without needing approval from a higher authority. Because such a choice would mean you don't need redemption, forgiveness, or a transcendent justification for your actions. And that cannot be tolerated. So no, no religion will ever grant you the right to die without pain, without conditions, without first exhausting every possible way to remain tethered to existence. And not because they want to 'save' you, but because your freedom to choose your end is a threat to the entire system. Control is not exerted over the living or the dead, but over those trapped in the limbo between wanting to live and wanting to leave. That's where you are most vulnerable, most manageable, most inclined to seek answers that someone else has already written for you. So if you're looking for a religion that grants you the freedom to say 'Enough' without conditions, you'll have to create it yourself. But don't worry, history proves that even then, someone will find a way to ban it.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Reactions: Valhala, yyytry, been__ready and 1 other person
ShatteredSerenity

ShatteredSerenity

I talk to God, but the sky is empty.
Nov 24, 2024
676
You mean like Heaven's Gate? That church gave members phenobarbital and a plastic bag for asphyxiation, it was very effective so now they're all dead.

You might find a few New Age religions that are more accepting of suicide. They usually believe in reincarnation and karma, and after death your soul might transition through different domains before entering a new body. Someone who commits suicide may have to spend time in certain domains and work through karma caused by the suicide, but it's not a judgmental process like many other religions.

When it comes to protecting access to suicide medications for the general population, I doubt any religious group with significant clout will ever support such a thing. New Age and other nontraditional groups are too small and fragmented to matter. Some of the more progressive religious groups are supporting things like MAID and euthanasia, though.
 
  • Like
Reactions: APeacefulPlace, yyytry and divinemistress36
L

lifeisbutadream

Elementalist
Oct 4, 2018
829
Japanese Shinto I think. Our old religions too. One could go out and go to sleep in the snow or similar.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yyytry and ShatteredSerenity
Rev346

Rev346

I’m here but will I still be next year?
Oct 23, 2023
144
Wouldn't surprise me if Pastafarianism, the church of the flying spaghetti monster, allows it's members to CTB. It would allow you to be that much closer to its beautiful noodly appendage.
 
  • Like
  • Yay!
Reactions: yyytry and Gustav Hartmann
B

been__ready

Student
Nov 25, 2024
127
Ah, a religion that grants the right to leave without suffering, without restrictions, without the need to invent some noble spiritual justification for it? A religion that does not see your life as a divine loan to be returned only when the creditor decides? Fascinating. If such a religion existed, it would be revolutionary, an anomaly, a masterpiece of consistency. But there's a small problem: the religious marketplace doesn't work that way.
Their first doctrine is that life was given to you by someone else. God, the universe, karma, cosmic energy—choose whichever name you prefer, the concept remains the same: it's never yours. It's a gift, a duty, a trial, a sentence, but never, ever a personal possession to manage as you see fit. And like any borrowed property, you don't get to decide the terms of its return. You can complain all you want, despair, even come to despise this 'gift,' but the answer will always be the same: 'It's not time yet.' And the best part? That time never comes. Suffering is sacred currency in religions. The more you suffer, the more you are worth. Pain redeems, pain purifies, pain brings you closer to divinity. But not just any pain—oh no, it has to be the right kind of pain, the 'approved' kind. Dying because a god decided so? Perfectly acceptable. Dying because society sends you to war? Legitimate. Dying because you're sick and nature has decreed that you must endure agony? A mysterious ordeal to be accepted with humility. But choosing to die because you decide it, in full clarity and without suffering? Heresy. And here lies the core of the issue: religions do not fight against death. They fight against the idea that you might claim it as your own. That you might choose when, how, and why, without needing approval from a higher authority. Because such a choice would mean you don't need redemption, forgiveness, or a transcendent justification for your actions. And that cannot be tolerated. So no, no religion will ever grant you the right to die without pain, without conditions, without first exhausting every possible way to remain tethered to existence. And not because they want to 'save' you, but because your freedom to choose your end is a threat to the entire system. Control is not exerted over the living or the dead, but over those trapped in the limbo between wanting to live and wanting to leave. That's where you are most vulnerable, most manageable, most inclined to seek answers that someone else has already written for you. So if you're looking for a religion that grants you the freedom to say 'Enough' without conditions, you'll have to create it yourself. But don't worry, history proves that even then, someone will find a way to ban it.
Wow… just wow.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yyytry
Gustav Hartmann

Gustav Hartmann

Enlightened
Aug 28, 2021
1,172
The Cthulhul cult could be a basis.
Or a renaissance of the Germanic religion. You have to seek death in a fight to go to Valhalla and to avoid Helheim.
Or join the Islamic state and become a suicide bomber.
 
Last edited:
SilentSadness

SilentSadness

Floating in neverland.
Feb 28, 2023
1,474
I think there were religions in the past where people weren't against the right to die. However they pretty much died out either because they killed themselves / didn't have children or because of the concentration of religion to just a few major organisations. There was a group called "the Shakers" who practiced antinatalism:
Espousing egalitarian ideals, the Shakers practice a celibate and communal utopian lifestyle, pacifism, uniform charismatic worship, and their model of equality of the sexes, which they institutionalized in their society in the 1780s.
Unlike the Quakers (their counterpart) they mostly died out due to not having children. So I think it's sadly just a case of natural selection. Pro-choice suicide and antinatalism are doomed to die out.
 
  • Like
Reactions: yyytry
Y

yyytry

:(
Sep 8, 2022
217
Ah, a religion that grants the right to leave without suffering, without restrictions, without the need to invent some noble spiritual justification for it? A religion that does not see your life as a divine loan to be returned only when the creditor decides? Fascinating. If such a religion existed, it would be revolutionary, an anomaly, a masterpiece of consistency. But there's a small problem: the religious marketplace doesn't work that way.
Their first doctrine is that life was given to you by someone else. God, the universe, karma, cosmic energy—choose whichever name you prefer, the concept remains the same: it's never yours. It's a gift, a duty, a trial, a sentence, but never, ever a personal possession to manage as you see fit. And like any borrowed property, you don't get to decide the terms of its return. You can complain all you want, despair, even come to despise this 'gift,' but the answer will always be the same: 'It's not time yet.' And the best part? That time never comes. Suffering is sacred currency in religions. The more you suffer, the more you are worth. Pain redeems, pain purifies, pain brings you closer to divinity. But not just any pain—oh no, it has to be the right kind of pain, the 'approved' kind. Dying because a god decided so? Perfectly acceptable. Dying because society sends you to war? Legitimate. Dying because you're sick and nature has decreed that you must endure agony? A mysterious ordeal to be accepted with humility. But choosing to die because you decide it, in full clarity and without suffering? Heresy. And here lies the core of the issue: religions do not fight against death. They fight against the idea that you might claim it as your own. That you might choose when, how, and why, without needing approval from a higher authority. Because such a choice would mean you don't need redemption, forgiveness, or a transcendent justification for your actions. And that cannot be tolerated. So no, no religion will ever grant you the right to die without pain, without conditions, without first exhausting every possible way to remain tethered to existence. And not because they want to 'save' you, but because your freedom to choose your end is a threat to the entire system. Control is not exerted over the living or the dead, but over those trapped in the limbo between wanting to live and wanting to leave. That's where you are most vulnerable, most manageable, most inclined to seek answers that someone else has already written for you. So if you're looking for a religion that grants you the freedom to say 'Enough' without conditions, you'll have to create it yourself. But don't worry, history proves that even then, someone will find a way to ban it.
Thoughtfully written…
 
LaVieEnRose

LaVieEnRose

Angelic
Jul 23, 2022
4,400
Yes. My religion. The pantheon consists of such divine illuminaries as @Forever Sleep,goddess of art, @Aergia, goddess of technology, @KuriGohan&Kamehameha, goddess of science, @derpyderpins, god of justice, @Pluto, god of wisdom.

I welcome converts.
 
  • Love
  • Informative
  • Hugs
Reactions: ThatStateOfMind, KuriGohan&Kamehameha, Pluto and 3 others
B

blackpillhopeless

Member
Nov 30, 2024
41
I find it funny how Buddhism is touted as a great loving religion but even Buddhism tries to fear people against committing suicide to keep the slaves alive to profit off them by saying you will just be reincarnated and face the exact same problem in your next life.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Ligottian and yyytry
Y

yyytry

:(
Sep 8, 2022
217
Been reading about extinction design…

We live in a world of control systems designed by humans.

Humans also design loopholes. All the time.
I hear the points that iterations in the past "died" off from lack of preservation (lack of offspring, torchbearers dying off)…

I see a pattern that if something benefits the wealthy, that is one vector for enabling/preserving.
MAID seems to be an indirect strategy for cutting socialized healthcare costs. So it continues, despite outcries.

I'm kicking the ball around.
I believe we all own our meat suits.

And that we can design a system that protects the right to die humanely…
 
M

martinso67

All human rights are important
Feb 5, 2021
362
EXIT international is my religion and Philip Nitschke is my lord and savior xD.

I mean he at least has followers and is controversial. So can kind of count him as a prophet. When prophets came to existence: they had a small following and they were controversial and got hate from many people, when they were alive..
 

Similar threads

T
Replies
16
Views
1K
Suicide Discussion
Unbearable Mr. Bear
Unbearable Mr. Bear
X
Replies
27
Views
944
Suicide Discussion
xiaoxiongmao
X
Redleaf1992
Replies
7
Views
369
Recovery
AnimeSlayersFan
AnimeSlayersFan