⚠️ UK Access Block Notice: Beginning July 1, 2025, this site will no longer be accessible from the United Kingdom. This is a voluntary decision made by the site's administrators. We were not forced or ordered to implement this block.
Any thought on Sundial concept
Thread starterWonhun
Start date
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly. You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
I just finished watching it when your post popped up.
On the one hand, I don't think we have the right to end other people's lives.
On the other hand, I often feel like humanity is a curse upon this poor planet, and maybe a "clean sweep" would be a good thing. Too bad it wouldn't just wipe out humans.
This is partly in response to another’s post. The technology behind the science-fiction stories is the part that interests me the most – I like stories that are based on relatively realistic science. I wanted to write a science fiction story where humanity was attacked by some alien...
sanctioned-suicide.net
On the opposite side, Plutonium 239 as a critical mass about 10 cm in diameter, so be hard to get a bomb smaller than a softball. If one includes dirty bombs as nuclear weapons, then a firecracker in a paper cup of radioactive waste would be smaller, but that's not a nuclear explosion.
A single apocalypse weapon leaves you no wiggle room. Would you press the button if enemy soldiers crossed a distant country's borders or attacked one of your distant bases? Would you end the world if your rival overthrew a friendly government? Can you protect an ally with a bomb that would kill them too?
Kurzgesagt asks what situation justifies detonating Sundial and I believe there is none. I understand that Sundial would deter other nations from attacking but so does the current arsenal of nuclear weapons. And detonating Sundial is like flipping the table into the air after losing a game of chess: an irrational and immature overreaction.
I see no point in making Earth inhabitable to humans and most other organisms just because someone didn't get their way. Great powers should continue to rise and fall if the alternative is calling a halt to the cycle of life.
I kind of like the idea though I guess I'd only really feel comfortable about it if it's under the control of a trustworthy figure which would be pretty unlikely.
I kind of like the idea though I guess I'd only really feel comfortable about it if it's under the control of a trustworthy figure which would be pretty unlikely.
How to be trustworthy enough for possessing control on destroying the whole world? I can only imagine its uses on the bad hand like Kim Jung Un in North Korea
How to be trustworthy enough for possessing control on destroying the whole world? I can only imagine its uses on the bad hand like Kim Jung Un in North Korea
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.